Our customers constantly ask us which is the best golf launch monitor between the Trackman iO vs Uneekor EYE XO2. We’re going to help you narrow it down in this guide, or you can connect with our team for a personalized recommendation on the ideal golf launch monitor.

The Trackman iO launch monitor is the most popular in the world. It’s what the pros use, and for good reason. It’s powered by high-speed cameras and combines radar and infrared imaging for the best data delivery possible. It’s incredibly versatile, but it costs nearly $14,000.

On the other hand, the Uneekor EYE XO2 launch monitor costs just $11,000 and still brings you incredible performance and flexibility in your simulator space. It uses three high-speed cameras for near-instant response times for live ball and club data. 

But we’ll need to take a much closer look at these two overhead launch monitors side-by-side to help you choose between the Uneekor EYE XO2 vs Trackman iO. Let’s dive into the details that matter most below!

Trackman iO vs Uneekor EYE XO2 (Fast Facts)

Pros and Cons of the Trackman iO 

This is usually the first name that comes to mind when people think about golf simulators and launch monitors. Professionals use it because it’s the best in its class - and at almost $14,000, it’s priced accordingly. 

Trackman iO is made for golfers who want studio-grade data and a clean, overhead setup that never gets in the way of the swing. It combines radar, high-speed cameras, and built-in infrared lighting. This means it can live in a closed room without extra lamps or floor hardware.

The unit reads a full slate of ball and club numbers in real time, then feeds them into TrackMan Performance Studio with tour-level visuals, dispersion plots, and club delivery charts. It’s the industry standard. But is it worth the money? Cost is the only drawback, really.

Pros 

• Clutter-free overhead design for multi-user bays and cleaner installations.
• Deep data set with ball speed, spin, spin axis, curve, height, landing angle plus club speed, path, face-to-path, dynamic loft, and detailed impact info.
• Built-in IR means fewer headaches dialing in camera exposure and room lighting.
• TrackMan software stack with Performance Studio, virtual courses, and practice tools are among the best in the industry for both coaching and home use.

Cons

• Price and software tiers are out of reach for a lot of at-home setups. You do get what you pay for, though. 
• Indoor-only design. It’s built specifically for golf simulators.
• It needs solid mounting structure, correct height, and a capable Windows PC. It fits best in permanent rooms rather than temporary setups.

All that said, you really can’t beat the Trackman iO when money is no object and you want the industry’s most trusted name and dependable technology. How does the other half of our Trackman iO vs Uneekor EYE XO2 comparison stack up, though? 

Pros and Cons of the Uneekor EYE XO2

This is the latest and greatest Uneekor launch monitor. The EYE XO2 brings you a similar ceiling-mounted system with a big, forgiving hitting zone and a ton of usable data but at a lower price.

The three high-speed infrared cameras sit above the hitting area and read both ball and club with a 28” x 21” strike zone, so you’re not punished for moving an inch forward or back. It works with any golf ball, includes Uneekor’s VIEW software out of the box, and plugs into GSPro, TGC 2019, and E6 CONNECT for sim play.

Pros 

• Large 28” wide x 21” deep hitting zone makes it easy to create an inclusive simulator space for multiple players with varying stance widths.
• All the data you need - ball speed, launch, spin, spin axis, path, face angle, attack angle, dynamic loft, lie, and impact location (total of 24+ ball and club parameters).
• No marked balls required. It works with your normal premium or range balls.
• Strong software options. VIEW included, with Refine/Refine+ upgrades and third-party sim support (GSPro, TGC 2019, E6).
• Includes a rough/bunker mat so you can practice more than perfect lies.

Cons

• Requires a capable Windows 10 PC with good graphics power and wired Ethernet.
• Club stickers needed on irons and woods for full club data.
• Overhead installation only. You’ll need to double-check mounting surface and ceiling height compatibility. 

You can learn more about the Uneekor EYE XO vs XO2 to see which is right for you. But you came here to learn about the Uneekor EYE XO2 vs Trackman iO - and we want to take a closer look at these two top choices side-by-side below. 

Trackman iO vs Uneekor EYE XO2: Side-by-Side Comparison

Be clear - you can’t go wrong with either side of the Trackman iO vs Uneekor EYE XO2 comparison. These each sit at the top of the overhead launch monitor lineup. It just depends on your mounting constraints, software preferences, and budget.

Technology and Sensing Method

The Trackman iO’s hybrid system uses radar for ball flight physics, while the onboard high-speed cameras and infrared lighting capture the strike. This gives the best of both worlds: strong spin and curve readings without needing long ball flight. Built-in IR lighting stabilizes image quality for rooms with less natural light/darker walls.

The EYE XO2 relies entirely on three high-speed infrared cameras mounted overhead to record the ball and club at impact and during the first inches of travel. Then, it calculates speed, angles, and spin from frame-by-frame footage. This photometric approach is extremely consistent and makes the system less sensitive to ball position and radar interference.

Installation and Operating Requirements

Both of these are overhead launch monitors, so you never have to worry about adjusting the unit based on stance for your left-handed friends as a right-handed player. But there are nuances in looking at the Trackman iO vs Uneekor EYE XO2 here.

The Trackman iO needs a solid ceiling structure or a mounting plate, but doesn’t demand extra lighting thanks to its IR system. You can pair it with a Windows PC capable of running Trackman Performance Studio, and you’re ready to start using it.

On the other hand, the EYE XO2 is a longer unit so you’ll need a bit more planning for bracket placement. It also needs more controlled indoor lighting - nothing crazy, but it won’t perform as well as the Trackman iO would in dimmer spaces. You’ll need a Windows 10/11 PC with a gaming-tier GP and a wired Ethernet connection.

Hitting Zone and User Interaction

This is another important distinction between the Uneekor EYE XO2 vs Trackman iO that’s often overlooked. The EYE XO2 has one of the largest camera-based hitting zones on the market at roughly 28” x 21”. 

This gives you tons of room to adjust ball position for wedges, long irons, and driver without worrying about falling out of the capture area. It also means lefties and righties alike can enjoy the simulator without having to make adjustments.

The Trackman iO has a centered hitting area sized for standard simulator play. You won’t move around as much as you might with an XO2, but it’s consistent and stable for players who keep a fixed ball position.

What is Measured?

You’ll find tons of overlap in the ball and club data points you can capture between the Trackman iO vs Uneekor EYE XO2. See the chart below for reference: 

Software and Simulation Compatibility

You’ll gain access to high-end virtual courses, performance ranges, club-delivery charts, and practice tools through Trackman’s Performance Studio, which is known for strong visuals and tour-level analysis.

Meanwhile, the XO2 ships with Uneekor VIEW and can be upgraded to Refine or Refine+. It also integrates directly with GSPro, TGC 2019, and E6 CONNECT. In other words, you have way more freedom to choose a specific simulator engine if you’d like. 

Brand Support and Warranties

You’re going to get world-class support whether you choose the Uneekor EYE XO2 vs Trackman iO, as both manufacturers stand behind their equipment. This is even more true when you buy one of these models here at Indoor Golf Outlet, the #1 choice online. That being said, both launch monitors come with a limited 1-year warranty. 

Cost Comparison 

Perhaps the most noteworthy difference between the Trackman iO vs Uneekor EYE XO2 is cost. That’s where you’ll see the clearest gap:

• Trackman iO: $13,995 
• Uneekor EYE XO2: $11,000

For what it’s worth, we have the lowest prices on either launch monitor here at Indoor Golf Outlet. You’ll also gain access to hassle-free financing if you need it. 

You’re paying more because the Trackman has a hybrid radar/camera tracking system. So really the question is, does the extra $3,000 for the Trackman bring you enough extra value to justify it? That’s something only you can answer for yourself! 

But, most people will find that the Uneekor EYE XO2 offers plenty of performance at a lower price. Neither is necessarily a budget-friendly pick, but they’re the best of the best!

Wrapping Up Our Uneekor EYE XO2 vs Trackman iO Comparison

So, could the Uneekor EYE XO2 be the Trackman alternative that saves you money without compromising on performance or compatibility in your simulator space? We hope this Trackman iO vs Uneekor EYE XO2 comparison has left you feeling confident in your next steps.

Remember, these are two of the best launch monitors in their class. If price isn’t an issue, go with the Trackman. If you are working within a budget, you can get exceptional value for the money in the Uneekor unit.

You can also explore the best launch monitors under $1,000 or the best portable launch monitor period if you want to explore other options. We have similar comparisons of Uneekor vs Foresight and Trackman vs Foresight as well.

Like we said from the start, we help our customers make the right decision for their specific space, goals, and budget all the time. So don’t be shy. Get in touch with our experts today for one-on-one guidance picking between the Uneekor EYE XO2 vs Trackman iO!